


Samuel Edwards
January 21, 2026
Legal work thrives on clarity, proof, and control, which is why the next wave of AI in law revolves around agent-based control systems. These systems let you choreograph specialized AI workers so they act like a disciplined team instead of a noisy crowd.
For readers in AI for lawyers, the goal is straightforward: keep human judgment in charge while AI handles the heavy lifting without wandering into mischief. Picture air traffic control for prompts, sources, and drafts, with logs you can trust and pause buttons you actually use.
An agent is a software entity defined by its role, toolkit, and operating rules. One agent might extract clauses, another verify facts against a curated knowledge base, and a third produce a tightly guided first draft. A control layer determines who does what, when, and under which safeguards. The result is structured, supervised delegation that scales complex legal workflows without losing accountability.
The control layer typically covers planning, execution, and review. Planning breaks a task into clear steps. Execution routes work to the appropriate agent with the right permissions. Review checks outputs for quality and policy compliance before anything reaches a client or a court.
Legal writing feels precise because it is. Citations carry weight, defined terms carry obligations, and small qualifiers can change outcomes. Uncontrolled AI is fast yet forgetful about provenance. It may mix sources, invent authority, or include sensitive information in the wrong place. A control system narrows those risks by imposing explicit policies, enforcing identity, and watching every handoff.
Privilege and confidentiality add a second layer of stakes. The system must ensure that drafts prepared for one matter do not surface in another. Even helpful suggestions become hazards if they leak client context. Control means inputs and outputs are tagged, traced, and filtered so nothing strays across the boundaries you set.
The policy layer turns office rules into machine-checkable constraints. Policies describe which models are permitted for which tasks, which data stores are acceptable, and what outputs must be blocked or redacted. Policies also define retention rules and export limits.
Identity and permissions bind work to specific users, matters, and scopes. Tokens, secrets, and dataset keys should not be shared across steps. Agents receive only the privileges required to complete the current task. When the task ends, access closes like a vault door.
Provenance tracks every transformation from intake to final draft. The control system records which documents were consulted, which tools were invoked, and how outputs were assembled. If a question arises later, you can reconstruct the path and confirm compliance.
The orchestration engine coordinates the work. It breaks tasks into subtasks, schedules them, retries failures, and enforces budgets for cost and latency. It also chooses between deterministic tools and probabilistic ones depending on the precision required at each point.
Observability closes the loop. Metrics and traces show what the agents did and how well they did it. Reviewers can mark errors, correct styles, and improve prompts so the system gets sharper with use.
Safety provides a last-mile filter. Structured output schemas keep drafts predictable. Redaction removes sensitive information before it leaves a protected zone. Citation checkers verify authorities. When something looks suspicious, the system pauses the flow and asks for human confirmation.
Start with intake and triage, where an agent reads the task, identifies the document type, and creates a plan. The plan is explicit, visible, and editable, which prevents scope creep and reduces improvisation.
A second agent retrieves the right materials from approved sources. Retrieval is constrained by matter, jurisdiction, and policy.
A drafting agent produces a first pass that respects the style guide, the matter number, and the role of defined terms. A review agent analyzes the draft for structure, definitions, and missing elements.
Another agent cross-checks citations against official repositories. If a cite fails verification, the flow loops back to research. When the draft clears verification, a formatting agent fixes headings, numbering, and exhibits. Finally, a release gate asks a human to approve, modify, or reject.
| Flow Stage | What the Agent Does | Key Controls | Output |
|---|---|---|---|
|
1) Intake & Triage
Understand the task and plan the work.
|
|
Visible plan Scope limits Matter tagging | Task plan + checklist (who does what, in what order) |
|
2) Research & Retrieval
Pull only approved sources for the matter.
|
|
Approved sources only Jurisdiction filters Provenance logging | Source packet (documents + citations + metadata) |
|
3) Drafting & Review
Draft fast, then check structure and completeness.
|
|
Style constraints Defined-term checks Issue flagging | First draft + review notes (gaps, risks, suggested fixes) |
|
4) Citation Verification & Release
Verify cites, format, then hand to a human gate.
|
|
Cite validation Fail-and-loop Formatting rules Human gate | Verified, formatted draft ready for human approve/modify/reject |
Each agent receives only the context required for its step. If the step involves summarizing, it sees the relevant section, not the whole archive. If the step involves drafting a clause, it gets the style guide and the allowed clause bank. Narrow inputs produce safer outputs.
Where the answer must match a schema, the agent writes JSON that conforms to that schema. Where the output must follow a template, the agent fills the template without improvisation. Determinism turns AI from a free-spirited poet into a reliable clerk.
Before a flow is approved, a test harness throws tricky inputs at each agent to reveal prompt injections, data leaks, or style violations. When a canary fires, the flow fails fast, and the record shows where and why.
Simple tasks can auto-approve under tight thresholds. Complex tasks route to a reviewer with clear diffs and comments.
Quality is not a vibe. It is a set of measurements. Start with instruction-following rate. Add citation precision and recall to evaluate whether the system cited correctly and completely. Track redaction accuracy to ensure sensitive terms were masked. For generative writing, measure style conformity so the document reads with one voice.
You also want timeliness metrics. How long from intake to first draft. How long from first draft to human approval. Where do retries happen? Which agents bottleneck under load.
Good governance starts with traceable decisions. Every job needs a durable log containing prompts, tool calls, sources, and outputs. When auditors knock, you can provide just what is needed and nothing more.
Regulatory alignment is a moving target, so design for change. Treat models as suppliers that must meet your standards. Require documentation on training data categories, capabilities, and known risks. Map your controls to internal policies and external frameworks.
Retention and deletion rules should be machine-enforced. If drafts must be purged after a period, the system handles it. If certain outputs must be retained for disputes, they are tagged for long-term storage.
You can buy tools, build components, or do a hybrid. Buying speeds time to value. Building gives deep control. Many start with a platform for orchestration, policy, and logs, then extend it with in-house prompts, templates, and custom agents. Avoid lock-in by choosing parts that speak common standards.
Treat models like interchangeable parts. Define contracts for inputs and outputs so you can swap a summarizer or reranker without rewriting flows. Keep embeddings and indexes portable. Isolate secrets in a dedicated vault. Above all, version prompts and test them like code so changes roll out with confidence.
Agent-based control systems turn AI from a clever gadget into a supervised team that plays by your rules. With a policy spine, tight identity, visible provenance, and opinionated orchestration, you get speed that respects the record. Set crisp gates, measure what matters, and design for change.
The result is work that ships faster, reads cleaner, and stands taller under scrutiny. That is the quiet magic: AI that stays helpful, humble, and on a short leash, while your experts focus on the judgment calls that truly move the needle.

Samuel Edwards is CMO of Law.co and its associated agency. Since 2012, Sam has worked with some of the largest law firms around the globe. Today, Sam works directly with high-end law clients across all verticals to maximize operational efficiency and ROI through artificial intelligence. Connect with Sam on Linkedin.
Law
(
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
)
News
(
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
)
© 2023 Nead, LLC
Law.co is NOT a law firm. Law.co is built directly as an AI-enhancement tool for lawyers and law firms, NOT the clients they serve. The information on this site does not constitute attorney-client privilege or imply an attorney-client relationship. Furthermore, This website is NOT intended to replace the professional legal advice of a licensed attorney. Our services and products are subject to our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.