PER CURIAM.
Jose Ruiz appeals the denial of his motion for reconsideration of the denial of his motion to reduce his sentence. Ruiz’s notice of appeal from the denial of his motion for reduction of sentence was untimely. See Fed. R.App. P. 4(b); United States v. Alvarez, 210 F.3d 309, 310 (5th Cir.2000). His motion for reconsideration did not toll the running of the ten-day time for filing an effective notice of appeal, because it also was untimely filed. See United States v. Brewer, 60 F.3d 1142, 1145 (5th Cir.1995).
Ruiz’s notice of appeal from the denial of his motion for reconsideration was timely. The district court was without jurisdiction, however, to entertain an untimely motion for reconsideration. See United States v. Miramontez, 995 F.2d 56, 58 n. 2 (5th Cir.1993); United States v. Cook, 670 F.2d 46, 48 (5th Cir.1982). Ruiz thus has appealed the denial of a meaningless, unauthorized motion. See United States v. Early, 27 F.3d 140, 142 (5th Cir.1994).
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.