LAW.coLAW.co

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Windell Joe BRIGGS, Defendant-Appellant

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit2003-08-20No. No. 02-51248
71 F. App'x 403

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

PER CURIAM.

The attorney appointed to represent Windell Joe Briggs on appeal has request ed leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Briggs has received a copy of counsel’s motion and has filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is granted, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal is dismissed.

MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

Pursuant to 5th Cir R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.