Judgment of sentence affirmed.
Commonwealth v. Jackson, Appellant
256 Pa. Super. 527389 A.2d 171
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.
Opinion
HOFFMAN, J.,
dissents because he believes that appellant should have been allowed to file specific, rather than boilerplate, post-verdict motions. WATKINS, former P. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.