LAW.coLAW.co

Commonwealth v. Jackson, Appellant

Superior Court of Pennsylvania1978-05-05No. Appeal, No. 2297
256 Pa. Super. 527389 A.2d 171

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

dissent opinion

HOFFMAN, J.,

dissents because he believes that appellant should have been allowed to file specific, rather than boilerplate, post-verdict motions. WATKINS, former P. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.