LAW.coLAW.co

VINCENZO LANNELLA ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. ARVID JOHNSON, RECORDER, ET AL., RESPONDENTS

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1948-09-03
137 N.J.L. 659

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Eastwood in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Ghiee Justice, Bodtne, Wacheneeld, Jacobs, Wells, Dill, Freund, McLean, Sotiettino, JJ. 10. For reversal — JTeher, Burling, JJ. 2.