OPINION
PER CURIAM:
In accordance with this court’s decision in Vento v. Vento, 256 Pa.Super. 91, 389 A.2d 615 (1978), we affirm the order of the lower court. HESTER, J., dissents as to the real estate involved.
Eugene MONTIGNY, Appellant, v. Carmela M. MONTIGNY, Appellee
258 Pa. Super. 547393 A.2d 493
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.