LAW.coLAW.co

Dominick Coogan et al., appellants, v. Amos H. Van Horn, Limited, respondent

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1894-06
52 N.J. Eq. 588

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Pee Cueiam.

Order affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Dixon, Gaeeison, Lippincott, Magüe, Eeed, Van Syckel, Bogeet, Beown, Geeen, Keuegee, Sims, Smith — 13. For reversal — None.