PER CURIAM.
Bennie Whitehead seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Whitehead v. Jarvis, No. CA-01-572-7 (W.D.Va. Jan. 7, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Whitehead’s § 2254 petition listed convictions on June 17, 1999, and February 25, 2000, but asserted claims related only to the 1999 conviction. The district court’s order does not discuss Whiteheads February 2000 conviction, and we express no opinion as to any potential claims arising from that conviction.