LAW.coLAW.co

William A. Kelly et al., complainants-respondents, v. Barnet Chinich et al., defendants-appellants

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1919-06-17
90 N.J. Eq. 602

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

This case was marked to be submitted on briefs, and briefs came in on both sides. That for the appellants, however, is not signed by counsel, and cannot be considered. The case stands as though the appeal had not been moved, and respondents are consequently entitled to a decree of affirmance. Hazard v, Phœnix Woodworking Co., 78 N. J. Eq. 568. For affirmance — The Ci-iiee-Justice, Swayze, Trenohard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kaliscit, Black, White, HepPENHEIMER, WILLIAMS, TAYLOR, GARDNER-13.

For reversal — None.