PER CURIAM.
The denial of appellant’s motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate the conviction which we affirmed in 280 F.2d 392 (2 Cir. 1960), is affirmed for the reasons given in the opinion of Judge Mishler.
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.
PER CURIAM.
The denial of appellant’s motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate the conviction which we affirmed in 280 F.2d 392 (2 Cir. 1960), is affirmed for the reasons given in the opinion of Judge Mishler.