Louis Roy CHAPMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BULLOCK, Correctional Officer, Female, Powhatan Correctional Center, sued personally and professionally; D. Newcomer, Captain, Powhatan Correctional Center, sued personally and professionally; John Bendrick, Sergeant, Investigator, Powhatan Correctional Center, sued personally and professionally; Eru Aldrige, Assistant Warden, Powhatan Correctional Center, sued personally and professionally; Jeffery Dillman, Warden, Powhatan Correctional Center, sued personally and professionally; J. C. White, Sergeant, Powhatan Correctional Center, sued personally and professionally; R. Edwards, Unit Manager, Powhatan Correctional Center, sued personally and professionally; S. Graham, Counselor, Powhatan Correctional Center, sued personally and professionally; L. Simmons, Correctional Officer, Female, Powhatan Correctional Center, sued personally and professionally; D. A. White, Sergeant, Powhatan Correctional Center, sued personally and professionally; R. M. Leabough, Hearings Officer, Powhatan Correctional Center, sued personally and professionally; Russell, Captain, Powhatan Correctional Center, sued personally and professionally; Wilson, Correctional Officer, Powhatan Correctional Center, sued personally and professionally; Spence, Correctional Officer, Powhatan Correctional Center, sued personally and professionally; Gosselin, Correctional Officer, Powhatan Correctional Center, sued personally and professionally; Godzwa, Correctional Officer, Powhatan Correctional Center, sued personally and professionally; Brooks, Correctional Officer, Powhatan Correctional Center, sued personally and professionally; Branch, Correctional Officer, Powhatan Correctional Center, sued personally and professionally; Harris, Correctional Officer, Powhatan Correctional Center, sued personally and professionally; Baldwin, Correctional Officer, Powhatan Correctional Center, sued personally and professionally; Roache, Correctional Officer, Powhatan Correctional Center, sued personally and professionally, Defendants-Appellees

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit2016-08-01No. No. 16-6354

655 F. App'x 968

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion · public domain

majority opinion

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Louis Roy Chapman appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Chapman v, Bullock, No. 3:14-cv-00463-JAG-RCY, 2016 WL 543165 (E.D. Va. Feb. 9, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED