PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Heilman v. Fla. Dep’t of Revenue, 727 So.2d 958, 960 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (“[I]n cases involving multiple filings of removal petitions, a state court retains jurisdiction to act when the federal court subsequently denies a removal petition which is based on the same grounds as a previously denied removal petition.” (citing Farm Credit Bank of St. Paul v. Rub, 481 N.W.2d 451 (N.D.1992))).
TORPY, BERGER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.