LAW.coLAW.co

Arthur J. Anderson, administrator, &c., complainant-respondent, v. Broad Street National Bank of Trenton, defendant-appellant

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1920-03-01
91 N.J. Eq. 331

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

We concur in the view expressed by the learned vice-chancellor in his opinion filed in this cause, that the case is indistinguishable in principle from Sullivan v. Maroney, 77 N. J. Eq. 565, and that that decision is therefore controlling. The decree will be affirmed.

For. affirm cunee — The Chief-Justice, Sway.ze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Mtnturn, Kalisci-i, Black, White, HepPENHEniEB, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, Ackerson — 14.

For reversal — None.