LAW.coLAW.co

RUDOLPH LAIDLOW AND JEAN LAIDLOW, PLAINTIFFS, v. HARITON MACHINERY COMPANY, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND RICHARD PORTMAN AND ADVANCED METALLURGY AMI-DDC INC., A DIVISION OF TECHNITROL, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS

Supreme Court of New Jersey2002-02-25
171 N.J. 334793 A.2d 714

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

ORDER

This matter having come before the Court on an appeal as of right pursuant to Rule 2:2-1(a)(1), and the Court having determined that the matter does not present a substantial constitutional question within the meaning of the Rule or applicable caselaw; It is ORDERED that the within appeal is dismissed.