ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 2nd day of August, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner is:
(1) Whether the Pennsylvania Personnel File Act [43 P.S. §§ 1321-24]’s definition of “current employee” means former employee, as was held by the Commonwealth Court in this case when it erroneously relied on nonpre-cedential dieta in an earlier Commonwealth Court decision (Beitman v. Dep’t of Labor & Indus., 675 A.2d 1300 (Pa.Cmwlth.1996))?