LAW.coLAW.co

Arpin v. Consol. Rail Co.

Supreme Court of Ohio2017-02-23No. 2017-0171
148 Ohio St. 3d 14142017-Ohio-644

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 104279, 2016-Ohio-8313. This cause is pending before the court as a jurisdictional appeal.

Upon consideration of the motion for admission pro hac vice of Dan Himmelfarb, it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted. Pursuant to Gov.Bar R. XII(4), counsel shall file a notice of permission to appear pro hac vice with the Supreme Court’s Office of Attorney Services within 30 days of the date of this entry.