LAW.coLAW.co

Smith v. City of Flint

Michigan Supreme Court2016-06-10No. No. 152844
499 Mich. 951

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order addressing whether: (1) the Court of Appeals erred in applying Peña Ingham Co Rd Comm, 255 Mich App 299 (2003), a Michigan Civil Rights Act case, to the plaintiffs claim under the Whistleblowers’ Protection Act (WPA), MCL 15.361 et seq.; (2) the plaintiff alleged sufficient facts to establish that he suffered an adverse employment action under the WPA, see MCL 15.362; and (3) the plaintiff alleged sufficient facts to establish that he engaged in a protected activity under the WPA, see MCL 15.362. The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.