LAW.coLAW.co

Roulette PRICE, Respondent v. Alan CATANZARITI, D.P.M., Petitioner

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania2016-09-19No. No. 177 WAL 2016
158 A.3d 65

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 19th day of September, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited to Petitioner’s first issue. The order of the Superior Court is VACATED, as issues neither raised nor preserved for appellate review are waived and may not constitute the basis for reversal of a trial court’s decision. See, e.g., Wiegand v. Wiegand, 337 A.2d 256 (Pa. 1975). The case is REMANDED to the Superior Court for determination based upon full consideration of the issues raised and preserved for appeal by Respondent.