IN the INTEREST OF L.S., a child. Chad Fischer, L.S.W., Petitioner and Appellee v. L.S., a child; C.E., father, Respondents and M.E., mother, Respondent and Appellant. In the Interest of A.E., a child. Chad Fischer, L.S.W., Petitioner and Appellee v. A.E., a child; John Doe, father, Respondents and M.E., mother, Respondent and Appellant

Per Curiam.

[HI] M.E. appeals a juvenile court order terminating her parental rights in L.S. and A.E. On appeal, M.E. argues the juvenile court clearly erred in finding that her children, L.S. and A.E., were deprived, that the deprivation was likely to continue, and that reasonable efforts were made to prevent removal of the children from the home. Because the juvenile court’s findings were not clearly erroneous, we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). [¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Jerod E. Tufte

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Jon J. Jensen