LAW.coLAW.co

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Charles Edward BROOKS, Petitioner

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania2018-01-03No. No. 434 WAL 2015
177 A.3d 822

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 3rd day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issues, as stated by Petitioner, are: 1. Is it unconstitutional to require [Petitioner] to register for a lifetime when said registration requirement exceeds the statutory maximum penalty for [Petitioner’s] offense? 2. Is the Adam Walsh Statute unconstitutional in requiring the [Petitioner] to register for a lifetime?

The judgment of sentenceis VACATED, and the matter is REMANDED to the Superior Court for reconsideration in light of Commonwealth v. Muniz, — Pa. -, 164 A.3d 1189 (2017).