LAW.coLAW.co

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. David BRICKER, Petitioner

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania2018-01-03No. No. 5 WAL 2016
177 A.3d 823

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 3rd day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to the remaining issue. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is: Did the sentencing court impose a harsh, severe, and manifestly unreasonable and excessive sentence in light of the circumstances surrounding the alleged incident? The judgment of sentence is VACATED, and the matter is REMANDED to the Superior Court for reconsideration in light of Commonwealth v. Muniz, - Pa. -, 164 A.3d 1189 (2017).