MINNISINK OIL COMPANY, INCORPORATED, APPELLANT, v. LOTTIE A. MILLER, RESPONDENT

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam, in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Lloyd, Case, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolesKell, Rafferty, JJ. 13. For reversal — None.