JACK WILLIAMS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. RUSSELL HARRIOTT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bodine in the Supreme Court. For affirmance—The Chancellor, Trenchard, Lloyd, Case, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 13. For reversal — None.