Pee Cueiam.
We affirm the judgment of the Supreme Court for the reasons stated in the opinion filed therein, except that we find it unnecessary to determine whether the appellant was an officer of the city of Newark and therefore make no suggestion as to the fact thereon. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Lloyd, Case, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.