LAW.coLAW.co

MARIE C. SCHANTZ, RESPONDENT, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY, APPELLANT

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1935-05-17
115 N.J.L. 174

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for ■ the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Lloyd in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Parker, Bodihe, Heher, Perskie, Yah Buskirk, Kays, Dear, Wells, JJ. 9.

For reversal — None.