Per Curiam.
Affirmed. See Atwater v. State, 233 So.3d 1276, 2018 WL 267081 (Fla. 1st DCA Jan. 2, 2018) (holding that a motion under rule 3.216(b), Fla. R. Crim., P., for a competency evaluation as a “precautionary measure” did not then require “a mandatory competency hearing” under rule 3.210(b), Fla. R. Crim. P.). Lewis, Osterhaus, and Bilbrey, JJ., concur.