Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Michael Cromwell appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Cromwell, No. 2:11-cr-00009-AWA-DEM-1 (E.D. Va. Oct. 21, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legál contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED