PER CURIAM:
This court has before it the district court’s orders dated July 31,2015, September 30, 2015 and October 15, 2015, dismissing this case. And all of pleadings, exhibits, and the brief have been considered. It is apparent that the Plaintiff believes he has been damaged, and that the Defendants have responsibility for that. However, this court has to decide whether we have legal authority to make some ruling on the complaints of the Plaintiff, or whether the district court had the legal authority to do so.
For there was to be legal authority of these federal courts to act upon the complaint of the Plaintiff, so there had to be specific factual allegations against each Defendant for which there might be liability. That is lacking in anything to be found in this record. It is necessary for this court to follow the law of Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009) and affirm the dismissal of the case.
AFFIRM.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.