LAW.coLAW.co

Edar Y. ROGLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Alexandra M. FOTOS, in her personal capacity, in her landlord capacity, in her premise owner capacity, for Christine Fotos, d/b/a Alexandra M. Fotos; Neil Harpe, Defendants-Appellees

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit2016-08-29No. No. 16-1323
668 F. App'x 462

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Edar Y. Rogler appeals the district court’s orders dismissing her complaint and awarding attorney’s fees and costs to Defendants and denying her motion to reconsider the order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rogler v, Fotos, No. 1:14-cv-00228-JKB (D. Md. Dec. 9, 2014; Oct. 22, 2015; Jan. 21, 2016; Feb. 26, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this courtand argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED