LAW.coLAW.co

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Miguel RAYO-CAMACHO, Spanish Interpreter Required, a.k.a. Miguel Rayo, a.k.a. Alejandro Gonzalez-Valdez, Defendant-Appellant

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit2016-09-28No. No. 16-10453 Non-Argument Calendar
669 F. App'x 530

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

PER CURIAM:

Aliza Hochman Bloom, appointed counsel for Miguel Rayo-Camacho in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Rayo-Camacho’s conviction and sentence is AFFIRMED.