Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Edward Dane Jeffus appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for relief from the court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in for-ma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jeffus v. Hollembaek, No. 5:15-hc-02240-D (E.D.N.C. Oct. 5, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
To the extent that Jeffus appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for failure to prosecute, Jeffus’ claims are rendered moot by the district courts thorough consideration- of his petition in its subsequent order denying Jeffus’ Rule 60(b) motion.