LAW.coLAW.co

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Keith Terrill PRIM, Defendant-Appellant

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit2017-03-23No. No. 16-16106 Non-Argument Calendar
683 F. App'x 745

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

PER CURIAM:

Richard M. Summa, appointed counsel for Keith Terrill Prim in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and fifed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Prim’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.