Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Antonio Owens appeals the district • court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for sentence reduction based on Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Owens, No. 3:02-cr-00548-CMC-26 (D.S.C. Oct. 27, 2017); see also U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 1B1.10(b)(2) (2016) (providing that a district court may not impose a sentence below the bottom of an amended Guidelines range unless the original term of imprisonment was below the original Guidelines range as a result of a Government motion for a substantial assistance reduction). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal- contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.
AFFIRMED