Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Sheila Clark Lewis appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to reduce restitution payments. On appeal, we con-fíne our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Lewis’ informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Lewis has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED