LAW.coLAW.co

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Robert ERSKINE, Defendant-Appellant

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit2018-02-27No. No. 16-11665 Non-Argument Calendar
713 F. App'x 997

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

PER CURIAM:

Kristen Gartman Rogers, appointed counsel for Michael Erskine in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Erskine and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Erskine’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.