PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See D.R. v. State, 178 So.3d 478, 482 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (holding that explaining trial court’s reasons for departure from DJJ recommendation is not required for court’s initial decision of whether to commit juvenile even when DJJ recommends probation; findings are required only when court departs from recommended restrictiveness level of commitment); see also D.G. v. State, 170 So.3d 1, 3-4 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015); J.B.S. v. State, 90 So.3d 961, 967 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012).
EVANDER, BERGER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.