LAW.coLAW.co

Steven Kent Bloom, Petitioner v. David R. McKune, Warden, et al.

Supreme Court of the United States2011-01-10No. No. 10-7273
178 L. Ed. 2d 741562 U.S. 11302011 U.S. LEXIS 319131 S. Ct. 930

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Kansas dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305 (1992) (per curiam).

Same case below, 220 P.3d 593.