LAW.coLAW.co

Laurie Marie Laskey, Petitioner v. Proctor & Gamble Company

Supreme Court of the United States2010-06-01No. No. 09-9828
176 L. Ed. 2d 1242560 U.S. 9372010 U.S. LEXIS 4506130 S. Ct. 3357

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District, dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305 (1992) (per curiam). Justice Stevens dissents. See id., at 4, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305, and cases cited therein.