LAW.coLAW.co

Jaime Taormina BISBING, Plaintiff-Movant, v. Glenn R. BISBING, III, Defendant-Respondent.

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals2018-03-12No. M-868/869 September Term 2017; 077533
180 A.3d 721232 N.J. 407

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

It is ORDERED that the motion for counsel fees and costs (M-868) is denied without prejudice to plaintiff-movant making the application to the trial court for fees and costs for work performed before the Supreme Court, and the trial court is hereby authorized to make the determination and award. For purposes of that determination, the trial court is directed to deem defendant-respondent as the prevailing party before the Supreme Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the miscellaneous motion to vacate the Appellate Divisions award of fees to defendant (M-869) is denied. Jurisdiction is not retained.