LAW.coLAW.co

Tawny L. CHEVALIER and Andrew Hiller, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Respondents v. GENERAL NUTRITION CENTERS, INC. and General Nutrition Corporation, Petitioners Tawny L. Chevalier and Andrew Hiller, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Respondents v. General Nutrition Centers, Inc., and General Nutrition Corporation, Petitioners

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania2018-07-16No. No. 32 WAL 2018; No. 33 WAL 2018
189 A.3d 386

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 16th day of July, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue as stated by petitioners is:

When an employees weekly salary is paid as compensation for all hours worked in a week, and the employees regular rate is determined by dividing the employees salary by all hours worked in the week, does an employer satisfy its obligation under Section 4(c) of the Pennsylvania Minimum Wage Act of 1968 by paying the employee an additional one-half times the employees regular rate for all hours worked in excess of 40, in addition to the employees salary?