LAW.coLAW.co

In the MATTER OF Keith T. SMITH, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No. 024721989)

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals2018-09-21No. D-133 September Term 2017; 081089
193 A.3d 867235 N.J. 169

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 17-389, concluding that as a matter of final discipline pursuant to Rule 1:20-13(c), Keith T. Smith of Egg Harbor Township , who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1989, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months based on respondents guilty plea to simple assault, in violation of N.J.S.A. 2C:12-la3, conduct that violates RPC 8.4(b) (commission of a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyers honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects);

And the Disciplinary Review Board having further concluded that the suspension should be consecutive to the three-month term of suspension imposed this date in D-83-17 (080676);

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that Keith T. Smith is suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months, effective January 21, 2019, and until the further Order of the Court, and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 1:20-20(c), respondents failure to comply with the Affidavit of Compliance requirement of Rule 1:20-20(b) (15) may (1) preclude the Disciplinary Review Board from considering respondents petition for reinstatement for a period of up to six months from the date respondent files proof of compliance; (2) be found to constitute a violation of RPC 8.1(b) and RPC 8.4(d) ; and (3) provide a basis for an action for contempt pursuant to Rule 1:10-2; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondents file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.