LAW.coLAW.co

STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Rainlin VASCO, Defendant-Appellant.

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals2018-10-30No. A-54 September Term 2017; 080426
195 A.3d 839235 N.J. 365

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

PER CURIAM

The judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division is reversed substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Espinosas dissenting opinion, reported at --- N.J. Super. ----, ----, --- A.3d ----, 2017 WL 10445742 (App. Div. 2017) (Espinosa, J.A.D., dissenting). Defendants guilty plea is vacated and the matter is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

CHIEF JUSTICE RABNER and JUSTICES LaVECCHIA, ALBIN, PATTERSON, FERNANDEZ-VINA, SOLOMON, and TIMPONE join in this opinion.