LAW.coLAW.co

MAQUILACERO S.A. DE C.V., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and Wheatland Tube Company, Defendant-Intervenor.

United States Court of International Trade2018-02-09No. Slip Op. 18–8; Court No. 15–00287
282 F. Supp. 3d 1353

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Eaton, Judge:

Before the court are the United States Department of Commerces (Commerce) Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand (Dept Commerce Nov. 27, 2017), ECF No. 51-1 (Remand Results). The Remand Results carry out the courts direction in Maquilacero S.A. de C.V. v. United States , 41 CIT ----, 256 F.Supp.3d 1294 (2017) that Commerce ... find that stenciling is not required for Maquilaceros products to be excluded from the scope of the Order and that, based on Prolamsas Final Scope Ruling, the analysis found on pages 6-9 of the Final Scope Ruling, and this opinion, Maquilaceros pipe [be] excluded from the Order. Maquilacero , 41 CIT at ----, 256 F.Supp.3d at 1314. Commerce complied and found that Maquilaceros pipe was excluded from the Order. See Remand Results at 12. Both plaintiff and defendant agree that Commerces Remand Results complied with the courts direction in Maquilacero , and defendant-intervenor did not file comments regarding the Remand Results. See Pl.s Comments on Remand Results, ECF No. 53; Def.s Resp. Comments Regarding Remand Results, ECF No. 54. Therefore, in accordance with the forgoing, and upon consideration of the papers and proceedings had herein, it is hereby

ORDERED that Commerces Remand Results are sustained.

Judgment shall be entered accordingly.