Forrest PERKINS, Appellant-Plaintiff, v. MEMORIAL HOSPITAL OF SOUTH BEND, Appellee-Defendant

Tavitas, J., concurs.

Kirsch, J., dissents with opinion.

Kirsch, Judge. dissenting.

[1] I respectfully dissent.

[2] Co-workers who testify at Unemployment Compensation hearings provide essential services to claimants, employers and the claims process. Often, they are the only unbiased witnesses, and their testimony is essential to the process, to the parties and to correct decision-making by the Administrative Law Judges who hear the claims. The importance of such witnesses to the claims process is not related to, or dependent upon, whether a subpoena is issued to secure their attendance.

[3] Officer Forest Perkins was discharged by Memorial Hospital of South Bend. The hospitals stated reason for the termination-a failure to pay a small sum for gravy in the hospitals cafeteria--was found by the trial court to be pretextual. The court determined that actual reason for the termination was that the officer testified at a former co-employees Unemployment Compensation Hearing.

[4] The majority states that Officer Perkins was told that he had been subpoenaed and would receive the subpoena at the hearing. When the hospital did not contest the co-employees claim, the Administrative Law Judge did not issue the subpoena. Memorial Hospital of South Bend then discharged Officer Perkins.

[5] Assuming the trial court was correct in finding that Memorial Hospitals stated reason for the termination was false, it has suffered no consequence from its wrongful behavior. On the other hand, Officer Perkins testified truthfully and suffered a very significant consequence: he was terminated from his employment.

[6] Common sense tells us that this is not good law.