LAW.coLAW.co

The F. A. Cigol Rubber Company, a corporation, complainant-respondent, v. Frank A. Cigol, defendant-appellant

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1922-04-28
93 N.J. Eq. 657

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered by Vice-Chancellor Fielder in the court of chancery. For affirmance — -Trie Chibe-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bersbn, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenrieimer, Williams, Gardner, Aokerson, Van Buskirk — 15. For reversal — -None.