LAW.coLAW.co

IN the INTEREST OF N.F.F., a child Danielle Tinquist, L.S.W., Cass County Social Services, Petitioner and Appellee v. N.F.F., a child, M.F., father, and Lisa Borseth, Guardian ad Litem, Respondents and H.T., mother, Respondent and Appellant In the Interest of N.F.F., a child Danielle Tinquist, L.S.W., Cass County Social Services, Petitioner and Appellee v. N.F.F., a child, M.F., father, and Lisa Borseth, Guardian ad Litem, Respondents and H.T., mother, Respondent and Appellant In the Interest of N.C.T., a child Danielle Tinquist, L.S.W., Cass County Social Services, Petitioner and Appellee v. N.C.T., a child, M.F., father, and Lisa Borseth, Guardian ad Litem, Respondents and H.T., mother, Respondent and Appellant

North Dakota Supreme Court2018-07-11No. No. 20180219; No. 20180220; No. 20180221
913 N.W.2d 768

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

[¶1] H.T. appealed from a juvenile court order terminating her parental rights to N.F.F., N.F.F., and N.C.T. The juvenile court found the children are deprived, the conditions and causes of the deprivation are likely to continue, the children are suffering or will probably suffer serious harm in the future, and that reasonable efforts were made to keep the family together. On appeal, the mother argues there was not clear and convincing evidence to support a termination of her parental rights. We conclude the juvenile courts findings are supported by clear and convincing evidence and are not clearly erroneous. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). [¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Jerod E. Tufte

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Jon J. Jensen