LAW.coLAW.co

IN the INTEREST OF A.T. Frederick R. Fremgen, States Attorney, Petitioner and Appellee v. A.T., a child, D.D., father, Respondents and C.A.M.T., mother, Respondent and Appellant

North Dakota Supreme Court2018-07-31No. No. 20180269
916 N.W.2d 111

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] The mother, C.A.M.T., appeals from a juvenile court order terminating her parental rights in A.T. The juvenile court found the child is deprived, the conditions and causes of the deprivation are likely to continue, and the child is suffering or will probably suffer serious physical, mental, moral, or emotional harm. See N.D.C.C. § 27-20-44(1)(c)(1). The juvenile court also found the child had been in foster care for more than 450 of the previous 660 nights. See N.D.C.C. § 27-20-44(1)(c)(2). The mother argues clear and convincing evidence does not support a finding that the child was deprived, that the conditions and causes of deprivation are likely to continue, or that by reason thereof the child is suffering or will probably suffer serious physical, mental, moral, or emotional harm. The juvenile courts findings are not clearly erroneous, and we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). [¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Jerod E. Tufte

Jon J. Jensen

Lisa Fair McEvers

Daniel J. Crothers