Per Curiam.
[¶1] S.L.S., the mother of D.M.H., a minor child, appeals from the juvenile courts order appointing the childs paternal grandparents as legal guardians for D.M.H. The juvenile court did not establish a visitation schedule for S.L.S. Her parental rights have not been terminated. S.L.S. argues the juvenile court should have included a visitation schedule in its order rather than delegate visitation decisions to the childs guardians. The State agrees with S.L.S. and joins her request for a remand for the juvenile court to establish a visitation schedule. [¶2] We summarily reverse under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(b) and remand for further proceedings. Interest of G.L. , 2018 ND 176, ¶ 15, 915 N.W.2d 685 (holding a juvenile court may not delegate parental visitation to a childs guardian). We remand for a determination by the juvenile court whether visitation is likely to endanger the childs physical or emotional health. Id. at ¶ 14 ; N.D.C.C. § 14-05-22(2). If the juvenile court finds that visitation between S.L.S. and D.M.H. is not a danger to the child, it must order an appropriate visitation schedule. [¶3] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Jerod E. Tufte
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Donovan J. Foughty, D.J.
[¶4] The Honorable Donovan J. Foughty, D.J., sitting in place of Jensen, J., disqualified.