Per Curiam.
[¶1] Charlotte Horst appeals from a third amended judgment awarding a divorce and establishing primary residential responsibility, child support and parenting time of two minor children. Charlotte Horst argues the district court erred in analysis of the best interest factors relating to parenting time and primary residential responsibility, abused its discretion in denying appointed counsel, and improperly disregarded a request for an annulment. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), (3) and (4). [¶2] Charlotte Horst attempts to raise various constitutional and other claims, which we do not consider because her arguments were inadequately articulated, supported, and briefed. State v. Noack , 2007 ND 82, ¶ 8, 732 N.W.2d 389.
[¶3] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Jon J. Jensen
Jerod E. Tufte