LAW.coLAW.co

IN RE: E.G.S., John Osman, Respondent, v. Tina Schmidt, Petitioner.

Washington Supreme Court2018-05-02No. No. 95485-2
415 P.3d 1191190 Wash. 2d 1016

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Johnson, Owens, Wiggins and Gordon McCloud, considered at its May 1, 2018, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered. ¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the petition for review is denied. The Petitioners OBJECTION TO MISSTATEMENTS OF THE RECORD CONTAINED IN RESPONDENTS ANSWER TO PETITION FOR ACCEPTANCE OF REVIEW is granted only to the extent that the reference to benefits of immunization are stricken and the remainder of the motion is denied. For the Court

/s/ Fairhurst, C.J.

CHIEF JUSTICE